|
Abstract:
|
Academia has argued that Congress has a vested interest in controlling the agencies of the federal government. While most of these agencies are not considered apolitical, the Offices of Inspectors General (OIGs) are distinctly required to remain independent and apolitical. However, the Inspectors General (IGs) still operate within a political system and are not immune to political interference. This research looked at whether Congress employs subtle methods for attempting control of the IGs or whether Congress recognizes the importance of autonomous IGs for the public trust and generally resists the temptation to attempt control. The research focused on the testimonial process, OIG appropriations, and the results of interviews of IGs and congressional staff. Results show that attempts at control or influence do occur; the extent of which varies. Control may be attempted through the confirmation process, hearings, appropriations, press, letters, and direct communication. |
